Islamabad Excessive Court docket dismissed the miscellaneous utility of FIA with penalty and indicated contempt of courtroom motion towards DGFIA.
A listening to was held within the Islamabad Excessive Court docket relating to audio leaks by combining two petitions.
Justice Babar Sattar of Islamabad Excessive Court docket heard the functions of Bushra Bibi and former Chief Justice’s son Najamul Thaqib.
The courtroom additionally heard numerous petitions of PEMRA, PTA, IB and FIA.
All three objection petitions have been filed earlier than Justice Babar Sattar heard the case.
The Islamabad Excessive Court docket dismissed the petitions of PTA, FIA and PEMRA by imposing a high-quality of Rs 5.5 lakh.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that contempt of courtroom proceedings may additionally be initiated towards DGFIA.
The Islamabad Excessive Court docket summoned the Joint Director Common of the Intelligence Bureau in his private capability.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that the miscellaneous utility of the Intelligence Bureau has been filed with whose approval?
The Further Lawyer Common mentioned that the Joint Director Common Intelligence Bureau has given approval.
Justice Babar Sattar questioned whether or not he would have a reputation, his mother and father would have given him a reputation.
The Further Lawyer Common replied that the title is Tariq Mehmood.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that he ought to seem himself on the subsequent listening to.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that the assorted functions have been filed, let’s hear it first, first the assorted functions will probably be determined, who has filed the functions? They should resolve.
Lawyer Common Usman Mansoor Awan mentioned that IB, FIA and PTA have filed these functions.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that I’ll take a call after listening to the functions which have come, IB, FIA, PTA severe establishments will take a call after listening to their functions, they’ve filed functions, now I’ll hearken to them. , Who has licensed them to file functions?
Further Lawyer Common Manoor Iqbal Dogal mentioned that DGFIA gave authority to Assistant Director.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned learn the related a part of the applying the place I’ve been objected.
The Further Lawyer Common mentioned that the FIA has requested to switch the case to a different courtroom, the objection is that 6 judges of the Excessive Court docket have written a letter to the Supreme Judicial Council, 6 judges together with Justice Babar Sattar towards the interference of intelligence businesses within the judiciary. Wrote a letter.
Justice Babar Sattar requested what’s the relationship between FIA and ISI? Is he a proxy of ISI? What’s the relationship of FIA with ISI problem? How is that this letter related to the FIA?
The courtroom directed Further Lawyer Common Manoor Iqbal Dogal to learn the related a part of the letter.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that the judges of this courtroom are supporting the allegations of Justice Shaukat Siddiqui. Learn it’s associated to ISI and never associated to FIA?
Further Lawyer Common Manoor Iqbal Dogal mentioned that sure, it’s precisely so.
Justice Babar Sattar requested the Lawyer Common whether or not FIA is an intelligence company.
Further Lawyer Common Manoor Iqbal Dogal mentioned that FIA shouldn’t be an intelligence company.
Justice Babar Sattar inquired whether or not FIA has something to do with blackmailing Excessive Court docket judges.
The Further Lawyer Common mentioned that this isn’t the case, however the phrase intelligence businesses have been used within the letter.
Justice Babar Sattar inquired whether or not FIA has something to do with putting in secret cameras in judges’ homes.
The Further Lawyer Common mentioned that no, they don’t seem to be associated, the function of businesses has been mentioned in a petition, that is why I’m saying this.
Justice Babar Sattar mentioned that if the manager blackmails the judges? So will the judges have a battle of curiosity? Is that this how you’d outline a battle of curiosity?
The courtroom indicated that contempt proceedings may additionally be initiated towards the authorities of PEMRA, PTA and FIA.
Justice Babarstar speaking to Further Lawyer Common Manoor Iqbal Dogal mentioned that the aim of submitting numerous requests to switch the case to a different courtroom is to embarrass the judicial course of, we and you reside in the identical world, we perceive completely, if the manager If judges are threatened and judges begin contempt of courtroom proceedings, how is it a battle of curiosity? Will the decide take contempt of courtroom proceedings for private acquire? Ought to the courtroom cease listening to all of the circumstances of IB and FIA? In case your argument is accepted, then no case needs to be heard towards the federal government.
Former Advocate Common Islamabad Jahangir Khan Jadoon got here to the podium and mentioned that I’m not a lawyer on this case however I wish to say one thing, high-quality needs to be taken from the pockets of all of them for submitting frivolous and frivolous functions, this cash shouldn’t be paid from the nationwide treasury. Ought to be achieved, this cycle ought to cease now.
Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, judicial assistant within the Audio Leaks case, mentioned that I’m joyful now that the judges are saying sufficient is sufficient.
