Tayyaba Gul, who accused former chairman NAB of harassment, says that as a lot as NAB officers harassed me, my husband additionally went by means of all this.
The Federal Anti-Harassment Ombudsman has reserved its choice on the jurisdiction of Tayyaba Gul’s utility within the harassment case.
Tayyaba Gul and the accused’s lawyer Nawaz Bharwana appeared earlier than the Federal Ombudsman, the place the Federal Ombudsman rejected the objection in opposition to Tayyaba Gul’s husband on behalf of the lawyer Safai.
The legal professionals of the accused objected to the criticism filed by Tayyaba Gul within the federal ombudsman.
It was mentioned on behalf of the petitioner that it isn’t a case of defamation, Tayyaba Gul filed a criticism for harassment, in opposition to Tayyaba Gul’s criticism, the accused filed a criticism within the courts of Islamabad and Lahore. Lies should come out.
The lawyer for the petitioner mentioned that the accused are fleeing from each discussion board.
Through the listening to, the federal ombudsman requested Tayyaba Gul whether or not she had a medical examination. Tayyaba Gul mentioned that the medical was not accomplished, the SHO wrote that Tayyaba Gul didn’t need to have a medical accomplished, I didn’t write that the medical shouldn’t be accomplished, name for a report, get a forensic accomplished.
Through the listening to, Javed Iqbal’s lawyer and Tayyaba Gul’s husband Mohammad Farooq spoke bitterly.
Tayyaba Gul’s husband Muhammad Farooq mentioned that the lawyer Safai is defending the soiled deeds of NAB.
Lawyer Nawaz Bharwana mentioned that Taiba Gul’s husband shouldn’t be allowed to enter the courtroom through the listening to.
Attorneys cleansing arguments full
Lawyer Safi mentioned that Tayyaba Gul’s utility for acquittal was accepted, the choice was not made on advantage, Tayyaba Gul mentioned within the court docket that if I used to be not acquitted on advantage, you’d have gone to attraction.
The federal ombudsman inquired whether or not an attraction was filed in opposition to Tayyaba Gul’s acquittal. On which the lawyer Safi mentioned that no attraction was filed in opposition to Tayyaba Gul’s plea of acquittal.
The ombudsman requested if there may be any committee in NAB to conduct an inquiry in opposition to the officers on corruption and misuse of authority. Lawyer Safai replied that there’s a committee in NAB on corruption and abuse of authority which works underneath the deputy chairman.
The federal ombudsman requested whether or not the NAB committee carried out an inquiry within the Tayyaba Gul case. Lawyer Safai mentioned that Tayyaba Gul has not given any such request to NAB on which an inquiry ought to be carried out.
Tayyaba Gul mentioned that I had utilized to NAB to take motion in opposition to Javed Iqbal, NAB officers, I didn’t get any report on the applying and no progress was made.
Lawyer Safai mentioned that I’m conscious that there was an inquiry on Tayyaba Gul’s request, on which Tayyaba Gul mentioned that she can be blissful that NAB had carried out an inquiry on my request, I wish to see the report.
The Federal Ombudsman directed NAB to submit a report on Tayyaba Gul’s request.
Lawyer Safai mentioned that Javed Iqbal was a former decide, he had been the pinnacle of the Abbottabad Fee, NAB labored to eradicate most corruption when the previous chairman was NAB, Javed Iqbal is our hero, until date no lady has succeeded him. Did not complain of harassment, Tayyaba Gul made a false accusation, the movies are additionally lies.
