Wednesday, December 6, 2023
PakistanSJC unanimously dismisses criticism in opposition to Justice Sardar Tariq Masood

SJC unanimously dismisses criticism in opposition to Justice Sardar Tariq Masood

“We’re of the opinion that it was filed maliciously to defame Justice Sardar Tariq Masood,” says SJC

Supreme Courtroom Justice Sardar Tariq Masood. — Supreme Courtroom web site 
  • “There is no such thing as a substance within the criticism, ” says SJC.
  • Grievance in opposition to decide was filed by Amna Malik.
  • Tariq Masood requested that get must be publicly exonerated.

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) Monday dismissed a criticism in opposition to Justice Sardar Tariq Masood because the huddle discovered “no substance” within the criticism filed in opposition to the highest courtroom’s decide.

Led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Qazi Faez, the assembly was summoned at present to evaluation the complaints in opposition to the apex courtroom judges.

“There is no such thing as a substance within the criticism and we’re of the opinion that it was filed maliciously to defame Justice Sardar Tariq Masood. The criticism is dismissed,” learn the order issued after the SJC’s assembly.

The criticism in opposition to the highest courtroom decide was filed by Amna Malik. 

Justice Masood, in response to the assertion, stated since he has been publicly defamed and because the complainant herself conceded that it was factually incorrect, he requested that motion be taken in opposition to her and in opposition to M Siddique, who had tweeted her criticism.

The highest courtroom decide additionally requested that since he was publicly defamed, he must be publicly exonerated, too.

In its order, the SJC stated that the complainant herself said that her criticism shouldn’t have been filed because the allegations weren’t right.

In view of the truth that the criticism was statedly posted by Siddique, a discover was issued to him to hunt his rationalization inside seven days “whether or not he tweeted, and if he had why ought to motion in accordance with regulation not be taken in opposition to him or as advisable to be taken”, ordered the SJC. 

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Recent Comments